What sort of country do we want to become? Ian McDonald skrifar 11. maí 2023 07:31 The Icelandic government has undergone a shift in priorities over the past few years. Not too long ago, the welfare and wellbeing of its people were seen as an utmost priority, and everything else existed in order to facilitate that wellbeing. Today, tourists and specifically the money they bring, are valued far more than the lives and livelihood of the people who call Iceland home, and furthermore those people now exist mostly to facilitate the wellbeing and comfort of those wealthy tourists. The government likes to claim that the vast amounts of money brought in by tourism will naturally trickle down and wash over the population, bringing prosperity to all it touches. This might be a reality in a fair and just system, or one where the biggest industries are not owned by a tiny handful of people and their families. In that reality, the riches only get concentrated in a few hands and then squirreled away offshore to avoid scrutiny from the tax office. The end result of this kind of a system is for Iceland to end up as a place just like Monaco. One which is hugely expensive, and where the vast majority of jobs are in the service industry, whose workers cannot even afford to live in the cities which they work, serving the rich who travel there. In these kind of places, the government does not care about high prices for food, housing or transportation because they know that the visiting tourists are happy to pay a premium for the privilege of visiting. Therefore there is no incentive to lower costs. Lower prices mean lower profits. Conversely, the workers are forced to pay these extortionate prices because they have no other choice. They are trapped in a system where they spend their entire paycheck just to survive. If the Icelandic government wants to live up to its well-polished, massaged image of equality and a high standard of living, which it likes to portray to the rest of the world, they must state clearly that the people who live here are prioritized more highly than tourist dollars, and to act accordingly. We live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. The GDP of Iceland in 2022 was almost 7 percent, which equates to around 25 billion dollars. There is no reason for people to not be able to afford to survive. No excuses. The author is a member of Efling Union. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Kynntu þér reglur ritstjórnar um skoðanagreinar. Senda grein Kjaramál Kjaraviðræður 2022-23 Ian McDonald Mest lesið Tröllin eru að koma Björg Eva Erlendsdóttir Skoðun Eiginleikar góðs leiðtoga Hólmfríður Jennýjar Árnadóttir Skoðun Kæru landar – af hverju eigum við að segja nei í ágúst? Þorvaldur Ingi Jónsson Skoðun Lágt atvinnuleysi? Lítum á tölurnar Halldór Jörgen Olesen Skoðun Verðbólga eða atvinnuleysi, hvort viltu frekar? Elliði Vignisson Skoðun Fulltrúar ESB á RÚV Jón Bjarnason Skoðun Af hverju vill ríkisstjórnin neyða bændur til að taka á móti norskum froskköfurum? Arndís Kristjánsdóttir Skoðun Þegar allt virðist vera í lagi í vinnunni Ragnhildur Bjarkadóttir Skoðun Greining Kolbrúnar Bergþórsdóttur á geðástandi andstæðinga ESB Gunnar Ármannsson Skoðun Bönnum Rússa en ekki Ísraela Sigurlaug Knudsen Stefánsdóttir Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Ísland vísar veginn í beinni nýtingu jarðhita Nótt Thorberg skrifar Skoðun Gjafakvótakerfið sem ráðherra Viðreisnar vill ekki kannast við Jón Kaldal skrifar Skoðun Hvað á að gera við afa? Stefanía Fanney Björgvinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Vandræðagangur ráðuneytis við kerfisbreytingar setur þingnefnd í vanda Leifur Þorkelsson skrifar Skoðun Hugleiðingar um heimili fyrir færniskert fólk á ýmsum aldri Sigrún Huld Þorgrímsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Verðbólga eða atvinnuleysi, hvort viltu frekar? Elliði Vignisson skrifar Skoðun Um brottfararstöð og vistun barna Grímur Grímsson,Víðir Reynisson,Sandra Sigurðardóttir,Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir,Guðmundur Ari Sigurjónsson skrifar Skoðun Kæru landar – af hverju eigum við að segja nei í ágúst? Þorvaldur Ingi Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Stöðugleiki eða sveigjanleiki Sigurjón Njarðarson skrifar Skoðun Lágt atvinnuleysi? Lítum á tölurnar Halldór Jörgen Olesen skrifar Skoðun Nýtt kvótakerfi í sjókvíaeldi — á kostnað landeigenda og veiðiréttarhafa Jóhann Helgi Stefánsson skrifar Skoðun Heilbrigðiseftirlit á heima í nærumhverfinu Kolbrún Georgsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvers vegna styðja Íslendingar dánaraðstoð og hvað veldur andstöðu? Ingrid Kuhlman skrifar Skoðun Ábyrgð í útlendingamálum – breytingar og árangur Þorbjörg Sigríður Gunnlaugsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Tröllin eru að koma Björg Eva Erlendsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Ofbeldisstofnanir ríkisins ráðast á Ljósmyndara Kristján Logason skrifar Skoðun Kerfisgreining á íslensku fullveldi: Hvar liggja hagsmunir almennings í skugga íslenska nýlénsskipulagsins? Sigurður Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Fulltrúar ESB á RÚV Jón Bjarnason skrifar Skoðun Óalandi og óferjandi Gunnar Salvarsson skrifar Skoðun Uppbygging nýrra hverfa skapar störf fyrir allt að 250 starfsgreinar Kristján Daníel Sigurbergsson skrifar Skoðun Manngerð mengun í Varmá kallar á aukið eftirlit með jarðborunum fremur en að dregið sé úr því Davíð A Stefánsson skrifar Skoðun Brjóstsviði á sumrin – þegar meltingin fer í sumarfrí Elísabet Reynisdóttir skrifar Skoðun Eiginleikar góðs leiðtoga Hólmfríður Jennýjar Árnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Var samninganefndin að vinna eftir umboði Alþingis? Erna Bjarnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Hræsni siðferðisriddara Sigurjón Þórðarson skrifar Skoðun „Við erum svo eitruð að við gætum ekki flokkast sem matvara“ Anna María Björnsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Er drónaskapur dónaskapur? Björn Steinbekk skrifar Skoðun Greining Kolbrúnar Bergþórsdóttur á geðástandi andstæðinga ESB Gunnar Ármannsson skrifar Skoðun Þegar allt virðist vera í lagi í vinnunni Ragnhildur Bjarkadóttir skrifar Skoðun Um mögulega 20 km styttingu Hringvegar á Norðurlandi vestra Jónas B. Guðmundsson skrifar Sjá meira
The Icelandic government has undergone a shift in priorities over the past few years. Not too long ago, the welfare and wellbeing of its people were seen as an utmost priority, and everything else existed in order to facilitate that wellbeing. Today, tourists and specifically the money they bring, are valued far more than the lives and livelihood of the people who call Iceland home, and furthermore those people now exist mostly to facilitate the wellbeing and comfort of those wealthy tourists. The government likes to claim that the vast amounts of money brought in by tourism will naturally trickle down and wash over the population, bringing prosperity to all it touches. This might be a reality in a fair and just system, or one where the biggest industries are not owned by a tiny handful of people and their families. In that reality, the riches only get concentrated in a few hands and then squirreled away offshore to avoid scrutiny from the tax office. The end result of this kind of a system is for Iceland to end up as a place just like Monaco. One which is hugely expensive, and where the vast majority of jobs are in the service industry, whose workers cannot even afford to live in the cities which they work, serving the rich who travel there. In these kind of places, the government does not care about high prices for food, housing or transportation because they know that the visiting tourists are happy to pay a premium for the privilege of visiting. Therefore there is no incentive to lower costs. Lower prices mean lower profits. Conversely, the workers are forced to pay these extortionate prices because they have no other choice. They are trapped in a system where they spend their entire paycheck just to survive. If the Icelandic government wants to live up to its well-polished, massaged image of equality and a high standard of living, which it likes to portray to the rest of the world, they must state clearly that the people who live here are prioritized more highly than tourist dollars, and to act accordingly. We live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. The GDP of Iceland in 2022 was almost 7 percent, which equates to around 25 billion dollars. There is no reason for people to not be able to afford to survive. No excuses. The author is a member of Efling Union.
Af hverju vill ríkisstjórnin neyða bændur til að taka á móti norskum froskköfurum? Arndís Kristjánsdóttir Skoðun
Skoðun Vandræðagangur ráðuneytis við kerfisbreytingar setur þingnefnd í vanda Leifur Þorkelsson skrifar
Skoðun Hugleiðingar um heimili fyrir færniskert fólk á ýmsum aldri Sigrún Huld Þorgrímsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Um brottfararstöð og vistun barna Grímur Grímsson,Víðir Reynisson,Sandra Sigurðardóttir,Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir,Guðmundur Ari Sigurjónsson skrifar
Skoðun Nýtt kvótakerfi í sjókvíaeldi — á kostnað landeigenda og veiðiréttarhafa Jóhann Helgi Stefánsson skrifar
Skoðun Kerfisgreining á íslensku fullveldi: Hvar liggja hagsmunir almennings í skugga íslenska nýlénsskipulagsins? Sigurður Sigurðsson skrifar
Skoðun Uppbygging nýrra hverfa skapar störf fyrir allt að 250 starfsgreinar Kristján Daníel Sigurbergsson skrifar
Skoðun Manngerð mengun í Varmá kallar á aukið eftirlit með jarðborunum fremur en að dregið sé úr því Davíð A Stefánsson skrifar
Af hverju vill ríkisstjórnin neyða bændur til að taka á móti norskum froskköfurum? Arndís Kristjánsdóttir Skoðun